The third series of the new Doctor Who continues to entertain (apart from one boring episode so far, Gridlock).
However, one minor gripe why does writer head writer Russell T. Davies insist on inserting a gay agenda into the series?
Yes, I know he is homosexual and yes I have heard that Queer as Folk was brilliant. But this is Doctor Who for Heaven's sake.
He should be sexless.
If he can travel with the gorgeous Peri Brown (Nicola Bryant) and not raise an er eyebrow, why does he now appear to be some great sexual creature?
However, one minor gripe why does writer head writer Russell T. Davies insist on inserting a gay agenda into the series?
Yes, I know he is homosexual and yes I have heard that Queer as Folk was brilliant. But this is Doctor Who for Heaven's sake.
He should be sexless.
If he can travel with the gorgeous Peri Brown (Nicola Bryant) and not raise an er eyebrow, why does he now appear to be some great sexual creature?
In the boring episode Gridlock why was it necessary to tell us (and all the watching children) explicitly that the two elderly women were lesbians?
And in Daleks in Manhattan why did he offer Frank the opportunity of kissing him?
It is unnecessary.
1 comment:
there is never any hinting that the doctor himself has any homosexual feelings, the doctor is indeed portrayed as "sexless",
the fact that you see something odd about having two of the characters in one episode a lesbian couple is questionable in itself, would it be inappropriate if one of them was a man and it was a heterosexual relationship?
(indeed, it would be much better if we bring our children up to be gay hating homophobic bigots with prehistoric attitudes rather than intelligent open minded people, would it not? 0o )
and the doctor only did for frank what he would have done for any woman, the fact that you focus on the fact that hes a man is your problem
the only reasons i can think of as to why you find a problem with these things comes down to your own prejudices
Post a Comment